129) ted in GWI veterans with positive LAC, as compared to those without LAC. |
130) ncreased severity of cognitive impairment compared to those without TDP-43 pathology |
131) ) with 102% higher F eNO (95% CI 80-126%) compared to those without each condition, |
132) ficantly lower levels of perceived stress compared to those women who did not (p < |
133) Compared to healthy individuals (8 studies |
134) hysiological profile of isolated dystonia compared to healthy adults remains unclear |
135) antly lower (~ 16-fold) expression in CP compared to healthy and lower (~ 24-fold) |
136) ere higher in CRC cells and tumor tissues compared to healthy colonic tissues. |
137) n glioma patients were 1.56 pg/dL higher compared to healthy controls (P = 0.05). |
138) on-HLA variants were found in AA OS cases compared to healthy controls and confirmed |
139) severe in individuals with Down syndrome compared to healthy controls through liter |
140) ample of good clinical grade SAH patients compared to healthy controls, we identifie |
141) gallinarum IgG titers compared to healthy controls. |
142) e myeloid leukemia (AML) primary patients compared to healthy individuals, and RBMX/ |
143) expression in EV from individuals with CP compared to healthy individuals; ~ 40 m |
144) topsy samples, vascular density was lower compared to healthy pons. |
145) 1, laminin, PDGFR-β and P-gp was reduced compared to healthy pontine tissues. |
146) e in food intake, lipid profile, and AUCg compared to healthy rats. |
147) in receptor type 2 mutation carriers, as compared to healthy subjects. |
148) or the first time that patients with T2DM compared to healthy volunteers have elevat |
149) Compared to a waitlist control (n = 50), A |
150) (14%) and main diagnosis of PFPS (15.6%), compared to a 65 km trail race, with 32.8% |
151) ement for the passengers' cycle time when compared to a benchmark scenario. |
152) Performance of IFA was compared to a commercial ELISA IgG kit. |
153) received their own low-percentile score, compared to a control condition, scored si |
154) demic efficacy and educational potential, compared to a control condition. |
155) centration of indoor PM2.5 (p<0.0001), compared to a larger 23.4% increase during |
156) s with enhanced antibacterial selectivity compared to a panel of natural polyether i |
157) involving real policies (n = 10), as compared to a predicted or simulated analy |
158) ptor knockout and displays its advantages compared to a pregnane X receptor reporter |
159) association for intakes up to 350 µg/day compared to a reference intake of 205 µg/ |
160) S did not improve the prediction accuracy compared to a reference model adjusting fo |
161) , a type of Recurrent Neural Network, was compared to a regression-based models on t |
|