298) r content after extraction and after each treatment were collected for microbial pro |
299) cs and one dog naïve to chemotherapeutic treatment were enrolled. |
300) ents who did not receive any preoperative treatment were retrospectively analyzed. |
301) six participants, currently in treatment, were interviewed. |
302) nique that assumed a detectable effect of treatment as a 50% reduction in the baseli |
303) ents of group A, in addition to the basic treatment as described earlier, received a |
304) vided into 11 groups according to surface treatments as follows: one control group ( |
305) 8 ± 0.71, p > 0.05) after 28 days treatment by GT. |
306) radiotherapy could be exploited in tumor treatment by developing combined radiother |
307) Its treatment by indirect reduction through us |
308) 27.5% for cumulative pregnancy rate after treatment cycle 1 to 3 and second service |
309) alan and prednisone) protocol on a 28-day treatment cycle. |
310) tes in three cases that had more than one treatment cycle. |
311) The treatment group showed distinct advancemen |
312) sity was also significantly higher in the treatment group than in the placebo group |
313) The magnitude of movement in the treatment group was higher (1.55 ± 0. |
314) Limited treatment modalities exist to ameliorate c |
315) typical osteoid osteomas as well as their treatment modalities. |
316) contrast warfarin with some of the newer treatment modalities. |
317) f the effect of adequate childhood asthma treatment on future risk of COPD should be |
318) icentre trials evaluating the effect of a treatment on persons nested within cluster |
319) We determined the effects of laser treatment on the surface characteristics o |
320) anidulafungin is an important antifungal treatment option for patients with liver d |
321) Therefore, oral magnesium may be a treatment option for women suffering from |
322) ive timing and planning the most suitable treatment option. |
323) Considerations of treatment outcomes and patient sensitiviti |
324) Incidence of side effects and treatment outcomes were compared to 14 con |
325) tility of these approaches for evaluating treatment outcomes. |
326) nty patients were recruited for a maximum treatment period of 14 days. |
327) erature increase during the 15- or 30-min treatment period. |
328) cant differences between two groups after treatment/observation period (p = 0.01 |
329) ewater effluent from municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) is a significant |
330) water samples from three large wastewater treatment plants in Belgium. |
|