318) Group B, the study group, included those w |
319) In group B, the lower healing rate was relate |
320) Group III received only CCl4, whereas grou |
321) A day after DMBA administration, rats in group III were injected intraperitoneally |
322) Rats in group V were injected ip with 100 mg 2-DG |
323) Animals of group V were treated with MET, vitamin C a |
324) In the control group, a reduction of 92.3% was observed. |
325) In the BoTA group, a significant increase in pedicle l |
326) proved histological findings in PF + EVOO group as against degenerative changes in t |
327) h baseline in trained subjects as a whole group, as well as in each subgroup. |
328) rated (SH), PH, and PH + curcumin; each group contains eight animals. |
329) ps: sham-operated, PH and PH + UD; each group contains eight animals. |
330) Fusidic acid group demonstrated a statistically signifi |
331) nalysis, the subjects in the intervention group demonstrated higher mean Hb levels ( |
332) There was no significant between-group difference in linear growth during o |
333) but expectancies did not account for this group difference. |
334) CP group displayed a marked renal failure cha |
335) The control group displayed significantly lower microl |
336) view was to determine the degree to which group dynamics-based physical activity int |
337) shed prior to 2010 that used at least one group dynamics-based strategy (e.g., group |
338) ght weeks after implantation, the PGf/Col group exhibited greater recovery of planta |
339) After cycling, the nonindexed group exhibited less reduction of preload |
340) In the TENS2 group, however, an increase was observed c |
341) In the TENS1 group, however, it was greater than in the |
342) s2PD in the test group improved over time and average dista |
343) Patients in the PS group improved significantly more (z = |
344) The examined group included 145 healthy male employees |
345) The examined group included 283 healthy male employees |
346) tigates the possible influence of support group intervention on quality of life (QOL |
347) influenced by factors other than support group intervention. |
348) ntuate the importance of focusing support group interventions on improvement of emot |
349) that the "effectiveness" of standardized group-based interventions for patients und |
350) ata from July 2011 to June 2012 via focus group interviews of 714 drug users recruit |
|