348) ntuate the importance of focusing support group interventions on improvement of emot |
349) that the "effectiveness" of standardized group-based interventions for patients und |
350) ata from July 2011 to June 2012 via focus group interviews of 714 drug users recruit |
351) Four focus group interviews were carried out with mot |
352) Intervention group patients (n = 219) had Mepilex(®) B |
353) ival analysis indicated that intervention group patients had a hazard ratio of 0·19 |
354) The nonindexed group presented higher initial preload (6. |
355) The SP group presented the best results, followed |
356) d within the mediums that include control group that has only DIM, negative control |
357) MDA level decreased significantly in the group that received DZN plus 25 mg crocin |
358) cise; mothers attended an open discussion group while the children attended their se |
359) Cd-treated rats compared with the control group, while the addition of PA in diet de |
360) albino male rats were divided into eight groups (10 rats for each group): control ( |
361) ay was also significantly lower in the PU group (166 versus 270 days, P = 0·02). |
362) analyses identify the double extreme (XX) group (18 people) and other 6 groups with |
363) y greater than that of the non-irradiated group (2.3-fold), but there was no signifi |
364) g the cases (6.3%) than among the control group (2.4%). |
365) creases were recorded for the diode laser group (2.61 °C), followed by the Er:YAG l |
366) ines to 88.3% to 91.9% in the middle-aged group (20-50 years), and appeared to be hi |
367) alues were significantly higher in the BO group (25.60% ± 5.89%) compared to the CP |
368) and randomly allocated to case or control group (32 per group). |
369) ssets approach, (3) empowerment of target group, (4) enabling of policy-makers and p |
370) cally significant higher in the alloplast group (47.15% ± 8.5%) as compared to the |
371) was significantly lower than the non PUs group (94 versus 414 days, respectively) ( |
372) curacy in discriminating CRC from healthy group (AUC: 0.866 and 0.897 for training a |
373) ervention (SMI) (IG) or a waiting control group (CG). |
374) neralization occurred in the Nd:YAG laser group (G2, 26.15% ± 1.94). |
375) Group (I) gavaged with corn oil (control g |
376) dertaken by the Inclusive Design Research Group (IDRG) are used to illustrate the pr |
377) up drinking clear water) and experimental group (Pb; group exposed to low doses of l |
378) dressing changes in the conventional NPWT group (P < 0·001). |
379) The Veterinary Cooperative Oncology Group (VCOG) membership consensus document |
380) ee equal groups: the animals in the first group (control) were fed with a standard r |
|