ELIZA cgi-bash version rev. 1.91
- Medical English LInking keywords finder for the PubMed Zipped Archive (ELIZA) -

ELIZA triplet kwic verb link Multi InLine WordNet Search InLine Multi WordNet reset

Clear cache

unConcat

Concat

restore:

protein species revealed associated total factors role cells patients gene there patient used increase further significant identified who significantly show risk rate demonstrated growth suggest human clinical higher increased used+to patients+with observed

kwic ON

abstract OFF

strict srch

Eliza Top

triplet

verb

InLine link

link

left(kwic)

right(kwic)

<<

<

>

>>

Srch Selected

return kwic search for among out of >500 occurrences
315808 occurrences (No.69 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [cache]

155) Better understanding of the relationships among these narratives could offer insight into intersections and disconnections in patient, caregiver and physician perceptions of illness and care.

--- ABSTRACT ---

PMID:30737250 DOI:10.1136/medhum-2017-011424

2021 Medical humanities

* Bringing narratives from physicians, patients and caregivers together: a scoping review of published research.

- Patients and family caregivers tell different stories about their illness and care experiences than their physicians do. Better understanding of the relationships among these narratives could offer insight into intersections and disconnections in patient, caregiver and physician perceptions of illness and care. Such understanding could support enhanced patient-centred care in medical education and practice. Narrative writing is increasingly common among physicians, patients and caregivers and uniquely positioned to reveal matters of concern to these groups. We conducted a scoping review to identify literature in which first-person narratives from more than one group (physicians, patients and/or caregivers) were considered as 'data'. A search strategy involving nine databases located 6337 citations. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts. Full-text screening followed (n=82), along with handsearching of grey literature and bibliographies. Of these, 22 met inclusion criteria. Most pieces analysed narratives by patients and caregivers (n=13), followed by patients, caregivers and physicians (n=7) and patients and physicians (n=2). Only nine pieces compared perspectives among any of these groups. The rest combined narratives for analysis, largely patient and caregiver stories (n=12). Most of the 22 papers used descriptive content analysis to derive themes. Themes of humanity, identity, agency and communication intersect between groups but often manifest in unique ways. What is absent, however, is a more interpretive narrative analysis of structure, orientation and characterisation within these narratives, which may reveal even more than their content. This scoping review offers a cautionary tale of lost potential. Many narratives are gathered and analysed but usually only thematically and rarely comparatively. We call for researchers to explore the potential of comparative analysis and the power of narrative inquiry in the field. Comparative narrative analysis may enrich understanding of how differences between perspectives come to be and what they mean for the experience of illness and care.

--- ABSTRACT END ---

abstract OFF

[

right

kwic]