kwic
data
data
right
off
ON
427
1
100
500
strict
ELIZA cgi-bash version rev. 1.90
- Medical English LInking keywords finder for the PubMed Zipped Archive (ELIZA) -
return
kwic search for data out of >500 occurrences
617251 occurrences (No.12 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [cache]
--- ABSTRACT ---
--- ABSTRACT END ---
[frequency of next (right) word to data]
617251 occurrences (No.12 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [cache]
| 427) Using secondary data (GIS maps and population census), coverage was plotted in respect to sociodemographic and presence of lady health workers. |
| PMID:22186395 DOI:10.1177/1010539511430850 |
| 2015 Asia-Pacific journal of public health |
| * Routine EPI coverage: subdistrict inequalities and reasons for immunization failure in a rural setting in Pakistan. |
| - High vaccine coverage at the district level may not translate with the same vigor to subdistrict levels; therefore, it is important to understand coverage inequalities. This study underscored vaccine coverage inequalities at subdistrict levels and explored reasons for immunization failure in a high-performing rural district of Pakistan. Parents of children aged 12 to 23 months were randomly selected and interviewed for child's vaccination history through a cross-sectional survey in 2008. Using secondary data (GIS maps and population census), coverage was plotted in respect to sociodemographic and presence of lady health workers. The proportion of children fully immunized was found notably low (75%) than officially reported (85%). Coverage inequalities were observed at subdistrict levels, ranging from 58% to 85% in rural to urban areas and from 60% to 80% in lower to higher income quintiles. Distance to immunization facility, parental unawareness, and wrong ideas about vaccination were statistically significant for immunization failure. Focus of immunization microplans at the subdistrict level are needed to achieve universal immunization goals. |
[
right
kwic]
(1)70  from |
(14)7 revealed |
(27)3 analyses |
(40)2 at |
| (2)55 were |
(15)7 support |
(28)3 can |
(41)2 by |
| (3)32 *null* | (16)7 was |
(29)3 concerning |
(42)2 clearly |
| (4)26 on |
(17)6 analysis |
(30)3 in |
(43)2 clustering |
| (5)19 and |
(18)6 obtained |
(31)3 indicated |
(44)2 have |
| (6)18 for |
(19)5 collection |
(32)3 may |
(45)2 here |
| (7)17 suggest |
(20)5 sets |
(33)3 the |
(46)2 highlight |
| (8)13 are |
(21)5 showed |
(34)3 which |
(47)2 mining |
| (9)11 set |
(22)5 we |
(35)3 with |
(48)2 show |
| (10)11 to |
(23)4 demonstrate |
(36)3 would |
(49)2 shows |
| (11)9 of |
(24)4 is |
(37)2 about |
|
| (12)7 collected |
(25)4 provide |
(38)2 also |
|
| (13)7 indicate |
(26)4 regarding |
(39)2 as |
add keyword
--- WordNet output for data ---