ELIZA cgi-bash version rev. 1.90
- Medical English LInking keywords finder for the PubMed Zipped Archive (ELIZA) -

return kwic search for different out of >500 occurrences
683276 occurrences (No.7 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [no cache] 500 found
82) When ektacytometry was used, RBC deformability was lower in SS and SC groups compared to the AA group and SS and SC patients were different.
--- ABSTRACT ---
PMID:23594502 DOI:10.3233/CH-131727
2015 Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation
* Indirect viscosimetric method is less accurate than ektacytometry for the measurement of red blood cell deformability.
- The aim of this study was to test the accuracy of viscosimetric method to estimate the red blood cell (RBC) deformability properties. Thirty-three subjects were enrolled in this study: 6 healthy subjects (AA), 11 patients with sickle cell-hemoglobin C disease (SC) and 16 patients with sickle cell anemia (SS). Two methods were used to assess RBC deformability: 1) indirect viscosimetric method and 2) ektacytometry. The indirect viscosimetric method was based on the Dintenfass equation where blood viscosity, plasma viscosity and hematocrit are measured and used to calculate an index of RBC rigidity (Tk index). The RBC deformability/rigidity of the three groups was compared using the two methods. Tk index was not different between SS and SC patients and the two groups had higher values than AA group. When ektacytometry was used, RBC deformability was lower in SS and SC groups compared to the AA group and SS and SC patients were different. Although the two measures of RBC deformability were correlated, the association was not very high. Bland and Altman analysis demonstrated a 3.25 bias suggesting a slight difference between the two methods. In addition, the limit of agreement represented 28% (>15%) of the mean values of RBC deformability, showing no interchangeability between the two methods. In conclusion, measuring RBC deformability by indirect viscosimetry is less accurate than by ektacytometry, which is considered the gold standard.
--- ABSTRACT END ---
[
right
kwic]
[frequency of next (right) word to different]
(1)21 from (18)3 amounts (35)2 compared (52)2 origins
(2)15 types (19)3 aspects (36)2 dietary (53)2 output
(3)10 between (20)3 cell (37)2 diseases (54)2 pHs
(4)9 doses (21)3 degrees (38)2 dosing (55)2 patterns
(5)7 concentrations (22)3 effects (39)2 ethnic (56)2 perspectives
(6)6 time (23)3 for (40)2 flow (57)2 protocols
(7)5 in (24)3 health (41)2 frequencies (58)2 range
(8)5 levels (25)3 mechanisms (42)2 gene (59)2 regions
(9)4 *null* (26)3 parts (43)2 genes (60)2 scenarios
(10)4 areas (27)3 roles (44)2 genetic (61)2 sensory
(11)4 combinations (28)3 species (45)2 human (62)2 surface
(12)4 components (29)3 ways (46)2 indicators (63)2 taxa
(13)4 groups (30)2 abutments (47)2 internal-cone (64)2 than
(14)4 methods (31)2 and (48)2 laser (65)2 therapeutic
(15)4 stages (32)2 approaches (49)2 masking (66)2 tissues
(16)4 tilt (33)2 bleaching (50)2 materials (67)2 versions
(17)3 adhesive (34)2 changes (51)2 molecular (68)2 views

add keyword

--- WordNet output for different --- =>いろいろな, 違った, 異なった, 様々の, 種々の, 異なる, 変わった Overview of adj different The adj different has 5 senses (first 4 from tagged texts) 1. (88) different -- (unlike in nature or quality or form or degree; "took different approaches to the problem"; "came to a different conclusion"; "different parts of the country"; "on different sides of the issue"; "this meeting was different from the earlier one") 2. (41) different -- (distinctly separate from the first; "that's another (or different) issue altogether") 3. (2) different -- (differing from all others; not ordinary; "advertising that strives continually to be different"; "this new music is certainly different but I don't really like it") 4. (1) unlike, dissimilar, different -- (marked by dissimilarity; "for twins they are very unlike"; "people are profoundly different") 5. different -- (distinct or separate; "each interviewed different members of the community") --- WordNet end ---