kwic
different
different
right
off
ON
94
1
100
500
strict
ELIZA cgi-bash version rev. 1.91
- Medical English LInking keywords finder for the PubMed Zipped Archive (ELIZA) -
return
kwic search for different out of >500 occurrences
683276 occurrences (No.7 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [cache]
--- ABSTRACT ---
--- ABSTRACT END ---
[frequency of next (right) word to different]
683276 occurrences (No.7 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [cache]
| 94) Furthermore, optimal cut-off points need to be cautiously chosen while screening for MCI among different populations. |
| PMID:34836228 DOI:10.3390/nu13113974 |
| 2021 Nutrients |
| * Evaluation of Available Cognitive Tools Used to Measure Mild Cognitive Decline: A Scoping Review. |
| - Cognitive decline is a broad syndrome ranging from non-pathological/age-associated cognitive decline to pathological dementia. Mild cognitive impairment MCI) is defined as the stage of cognition that falls between normal ageing and dementia. Studies have found that early lifestyle interventions for MCI may delay its pathological progression. Hence, this review aims to determine the most efficient cognitive tools to discriminate mild cognitive decline in its early stages. After a systematic search of five online databases, a total of 52 different cognitive tools were identified. The performance of each tool was assessed by its psychometric properties, administration time and delivery method. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA, n = 15), the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE, n = 14) and the Clock Drawing Test (CDT, n = 4) were most frequently cited in the literature. The preferable tools with all-round performance are the Six-item Cognitive Impairment Test (6CIT), MoCA (with the cut-offs of ≤24/22/19/15.5), MMSE (with the cut-off of ≤26) and the Hong Kong Brief Cognitive Test (HKBC). In addition, SAGE is recommended for a self-completed survey setting whilst a 4-point CDT is quick and easy to be added into other cognitive assessments. However, most tools were affected by age and education levels. Furthermore, optimal cut-off points need to be cautiously chosen while screening for MCI among different populations. |
[
right
kwic]
(1)21  types |
(18)3 combinations |
(35)2 applications |
(52)2 languages, |
| (2)8 methods |
(19)3 contexts |
(36)2 areas |
(53)2 levels: |
| (3)8 treatment |
(20)3 databases |
(37)2 between |
(54)2 lipid |
| (4)7 from |
(21)3 definitions |
(38)2 cell |
(55)2 methodological |
| (5)6 levels |
(22)3 developmental |
(39)2 cognitive |
(56)2 methods, |
| (6)6 studies |
(23)3 drugs |
(40)2 communities |
(57)2 modes |
| (7)5 aspects |
(24)3 interventions |
(41)2 components |
(58)2 movement |
| (8)5 in |
(25)3 models |
(42)2 concentrations |
(59)2 phenotypes |
| (9)5 settings |
(26)3 populations, |
(43)2 conditions |
(60)2 physical |
| (10)4 clinical |
(27)3 research |
(44)2 consensus |
(61)2 probiotics |
| (11)4 countries |
(28)3 scales |
(45)2 countries, |
(62)2 situations |
| (12)4 factors |
(29)3 surfaces |
(46)2 designs |
(63)2 stakeholders |
| (13)4 forms |
(30)3 than |
(47)2 diagnostic |
(64)2 study |
| (14)4 mechanisms |
(31)3 ways |
(48)2 environments |
(65)2 surface |
| (15)4 populations |
(32)2 DNA |
(49)2 ethnic |
(66)2 techniques |
| (16)4 strategies |
(33)2 UER |
(50)2 fields |
(67)2 tissues |
| (17)3 approaches |
(34)2 age |
(51)2 global |
add keyword
--- WordNet output for different ---