kwic
further
further
right
off
ON
207
1
100
500
strict
ELIZA cgi-bash version rev. 1.90
- Medical English LInking keywords finder for the PubMed Zipped Archive (ELIZA) -
return
kwic search for further out of >500 occurrences
298283 occurrences (No.79 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [no cache] 500 found
--- ABSTRACT ---
--- ABSTRACT END ---
[frequency of next (right) word to further]
298283 occurrences (No.79 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [no cache] 500 found
| 207) Focus groups helped answer "why" certain patterns emerged and allowed us to further explore communication events within a group setting. |
| PMID:24483246 DOI:10.1080/10410236.2013.835894 |
| 2015 Health communication |
| * The use of multiple qualitative methods to characterize communication events between physicians and nurses. |
| - Despite the importance of communication to patient safety in hospital settings, we know surprisingly little about communication patterns between physicians and nurses, particularly on general medical-surgical units. Poor communication is the leading cause of preventable adverse events in hospitals, as well as a major root cause of sentinel events. The literature provides little guidance on what qualitative methods are best for capturing different types of communication events and patterns. The purpose of this study was to develop a methodology for identifying and characterizing communication events between physicians and nurses to better understand communication patterns on general medical-surgical units. We used a sequential qualitative mixed method design beginning with general observation, progressing to shadowing and focus groups of physicians and nurses who worked on two medical-surgical units at one academically affiliated U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospital. Each data collection method (observation, shadowing, and focus groups) had its own advantages and disadvantages for capturing communication events and patterns. Through observation we were able to see the "what": communication activities. Shadowing was most useful for understanding "how" physicians and nurses communicated. Focus groups helped answer "why" certain patterns emerged and allowed us to further explore communication events within a group setting. By using all three methods we were able to more thoroughly characterize communication events than by using a single method alone, providing a more holistic picture of how communication occurs on an inpatient medical-surgical unit. |
[
right
kwic]
(1)39  studies |
(16)4 developed |
(31)2 analyses |
(46)2 insights |
| (2)32 research |
(17)4 in |
(32)2 analyzed |
(47)2 monitoring |
| (3)18 investigation |
(18)4 supported |
(33)2 application |
(48)2 optimization |
| (4)18 study |
(19)3 *null* | (34)2 as |
(49)2 prospective |
| (5)11 the |
(20)3 a |
(35)2 assessed |
(50)2 protection |
| (6)10 investigations |
(21)3 clinical |
(36)2 complications |
(51)2 spread |
| (7)8 analysis |
(22)3 evaluation |
(37)2 divided |
(52)2 suggests |
| (8)7 evidence |
(23)3 exploration |
(38)2 elucidate |
(53)2 supporting |
| (9)7 phylogenetic |
(24)3 explore |
(39)2 enhance |
(54)2 supports |
| (10)6 explored |
(25)3 for |
(40)2 episodes |
(55)2 taxonomic |
| (11)5 development |
(26)3 increased |
(41)2 evaluated |
(56)2 that |
| (12)5 support |
(27)3 investigate |
(42)2 examination |
(57)2 used |
| (13)5 validation |
(28)3 molecular |
(43)2 identification |
|
| (14)4 by |
(29)3 understand |
(44)2 improvement |
|
| (15)4 confirmed |
(30)2 advances |
(45)2 increase |
add keyword
--- WordNet output for further ---