ELIZA

return kwic search for group out of >500 occurrences
385944 occurrences (No.46 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [no cache] 500 found

143) Results revealed that there were significantly fewer patients with pressure ulcers in the intervention group compared to the control group (5 versus 20, P = 0·001).

--- ABSTRACT ---

PMID:23711244 DOI:10.1111/iwj.12101

2015 International wound journal

* A randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of soft silicone multi-layered foam dressings in the prevention of sacral and heel pressure ulcers in trauma and critically ill patients: the border trial.

- The prevention of hospital acquired pressure ulcers in critically ill patients remains a significant clinical challenge. The aim of this trial was to investigate the effectiveness of multi-layered soft silicone foam dressings in preventing intensive care unit (ICU) pressure ulcers when applied in the emergency department to 440 trauma and critically ill patients. Intervention group patients (n = 219) had Mepilex(®) Border Sacrum and Mepilex(®) Heel dressings applied in the emergency department and maintained throughout their ICU stay. Results revealed that there were significantly fewer patients with pressure ulcers in the intervention group compared to the control group (5 versus 20, P = 0·001). This represented a 10% difference in incidence between the groups (3·1% versus 13·1%) and a number needed to treat of ten patients to prevent one pressure ulcer. Overall there were fewer sacral (2 versus 8, P = 0·05) and heel pressure ulcers (5 versus 19, P = 0·002) and pressure injuries overall (7 versus 27, P = 0·002) in interventions than in controls. The time to injury survival analysis indicated that intervention group patients had a hazard ratio of 0·19 (P = 0·002) compared to control group patients. We conclude that multi-layered soft silicone foam dressings are effective in preventing pressure ulcers in critically ill patients when applied in the emergency department prior to ICU transfer.

--- ABSTRACT END ---

[
right
kwic]

[frequency of next (right) word to group]

(1)49 null	(15)7 received	(29)3 II	(44)2 difference
(2)33 was	(16)5 at	(30)3 after	(45)2 displayed
(3)29 and	(17)5 for	(31)3 comprised	(46)2 dynamics-based
(4)25 of	(18)5 the	(32)3 in	(47)2 exhibited
(5)16 compared	(19)5 to	(33)3 when	(48)2 however,
(6)12 A	(20)4 (p	(34)2 (30	(49)2 improved
(7)12 were	(21)4 B	(35)2 (n	(50)2 included
(8)11 discussions	(22)4 C	(37)2 B,	(51)2 intervention
(9)10 than	(23)4 differences	(38)2 III	(52)2 interventions
(10)9 I	(24)4 or	(39)2 V	(53)2 interviews
(11)8 had	(25)3 1,	(40)2 a	(54)2 patients
(12)8 showed	(26)3 2	(41)2 as	(55)2 presented
(13)8 with	(27)3 4	(42)2 contains	(56)2 that
(14)7 1	(28)3 A,	(43)2 demonstrated

add keyword

--- WordNet output for group --- =>一団にする, 集める, 分派, 集団, グループ, 分類する, 演奏家グループ, 集まる, 分ける Overview of noun group The noun group has 3 senses (first 2 from tagged texts) 1. (1345) group, grouping -- (any number of entities (members) considered as a unit) 2. (1) group, radical, chemical group -- ((chemistry) two or more atoms bound together as a single unit and forming part of a molecule) 3. group, mathematical group -- (a set that is closed, associative, has an identity element and every element has an inverse) Overview of verb group The verb group has 2 senses (first 2 from tagged texts) 1. (4) group -- (arrange into a group or groups; "Can you group these shapes together?") 2. (1) group, aggroup -- (form a group or group together) --- WordNet end ---