kwic
while
while
right
off
ON
100
1
100
500
strict
ELIZA cgi-bash version rev. 1.90
- Medical English LInking keywords finder for the PubMed Zipped Archive (ELIZA) -
return
kwic search for while out of >500 occurrences
341393 occurrences (No.55 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [no cache] 500 found
--- ABSTRACT ---
--- ABSTRACT END ---
[frequency of next (right) word to while]
341393 occurrences (No.55 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [no cache] 500 found
| 100) An anchor loss of 0.1 mm (0.06%) was observed in the maxilla while no mandibular anchor loss was recorded. |
| PMID:23573806 DOI:10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00227 |
| 2015 The Journal of oral implantology |
| * Clinical application of micro-implant anchorage in initial orthodontic retraction. |
| - Micro-implant is a device that is temporarily fixed to bone for the purpose of enhancing orthodontic anchorage either by supporting the teeth of the reactive unit or by obviating the need for the reactive unit altogether, and which is subsequently removed after use. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficiency of micro-implants in reinforcing anchorage during the initial retraction of anterior teeth, check the rate of initial retraction for 8 weeks, and assess the stability of micro-implants during this period. Eighteen micro-implants were placed (10 in the maxilla and 8 in the mandible) and immediately loaded with 200-250 g of force using 9-mm closed coil Nitinol springs. The amount of space closure was measured every 2 weeks until the eighth week. Cephalometric measurements were made at the end of the study to evaluate anchor loss, if any. Micro-implant stability was also assessed. The rate of initial retraction in the maxilla at the end of 8 weeks was 1.65 mm/quadrant and 1.51 mm/quadrant in the mandible. The amount of retraction on the left side of the arches was 1.66 mm/quadrant and 1.49 mm/quadrant on the right side. The average initial retraction for both arches per month was 0.78 mm. An anchor loss of 0.1 mm (0.06%) was observed in the maxilla while no mandibular anchor loss was recorded. The rate of initial retraction observed in the maxilla was more than that achieved in the mandible. Initial retraction was also more on the left side of the arches. There was no anchor loss in the mandible. The micro-implant-reinforced anchorage was helpful in minimizing anchor loss and accepted heavy traction forces but did not bring about a faster rate of retraction. |
[
right
kwic]
(1)79  the |
(16)3 it |
(31)2 environmental |
(46)2 promoting |
| (2)14 in |
(17)3 its |
(32)2 focusing |
(47)2 providing |
| (3)13 no |
(18)3 most |
(33)2 for |
(48)2 receiving |
| (4)11 a |
(19)3 others |
(34)2 further |
(49)2 serum |
| (5)6 this |
(20)3 that |
(35)2 harvesting |
(50)2 she |
| (6)4 at |
(21)3 there |
(36)2 increasing |
(51)2 significant |
| (7)4 maintaining |
(22)3 these |
(37)2 minimising |
(52)2 similar |
| (8)4 one |
(23)3 those |
(38)2 much |
(53)2 slightly |
| (9)4 performing |
(24)3 women |
(39)2 negative |
(54)2 some |
| (10)4 reducing |
(25)2 Asians |
(40)2 numerous |
(55)2 still |
| (11)4 retaining |
(26)2 accounting |
(41)2 on |
(56)2 subcutaneous |
| (12)4 simultaneously |
(27)2 also |
(42)2 other |
(57)2 their |
| (13)4 they |
(28)2 controlling |
(43)2 participants |
|
| (14)4 using |
(29)2 digging/gardening, |
(44)2 preserving |
|
| (15)3 20% |
(30)2 downregulation |
(45)2 previous |
add keyword
--- WordNet output for while ---