| 1) Compared to the AMI model group, STVNa adm |
| 2) Compared to the MMPI-2-RF normative sample |
| 3) Compared to the amount of research that ha |
| 4) Compared to the phase 3 platform trials th |
| 5) Compared to the pre-lockdown period, the c |
| 6) k (1.42 ± 1.52 ml · min-1 · kg-1) when compared to the 50% BW group (-0.87 ± 2.2 |
| 7) We demonstrate that compared to the AP test, the HP test has a |
| 8) superior sensitivity at 100% specificity compared to the Athlete Biological Passpor |
| 9) e overall agreement using derived cutoffs compared to the CCP EUA Ortho VITROS cutof |
| 10) Hip extension was less in the PAHD group compared to the Control group (p = 0.008) |
| 11) , higher ketones and lower glucose levels compared to the HC diet (p < 0.05). |
| 12) rceived exertion higher, on the LCHF diet compared to the HC diet on both occasions. |
| 13) e of total time in the very light HR zone compared to the LF group (p ≤ 0.039; d = |
| 14) latively high potency cytokine production compared to the Mincle ligand trehalose di |
| 15) re blood vessels in the newly formed bone compared to the PLA and PLA-PDA scaffold g |
| 16) trated 1.6-fold higher new bone formation compared to the PLA-PDA scaffold. |
| 17) t Mexican immigrants have lower mortality compared to the US-born population, despit |
| 18) fold weaker average dissociation constant compared to the WT. |
| 19) I is highly expressed in benign tumors as compared to the atypical meningioma with a |
| 20) and experience cancer health disparities compared to the cisgender population. |
| 21) sia, as did those treated with LY3000328, compared to the control cancer mice. |
| 22) 4% when standardized to 0-100% scale), as compared to the control group (mean score |
| 23) e spent in the dark compartment increased compared to the control group in the shutt |
| 24) icantly reduced in the intervention group compared to the control group with 50% of |
| 25) lligence scores among the radiation group compared to the control group, lower verba |
| 26) e (IR), and HOMA2 beta-cell function (β) compared to the control group. |
| 27) 5% CI: - 1.24 to 1.48) in T2DM patients compared to the control groups of the pati |
| 28) Increases in biogas production compared to the control increased with the |
| 29) ighest relative improvement of properties compared to the control occurred at 10 or |
| 30) vention was reported to be cost-effective compared to the control, one of which save |
| 31) 22.6 and 92.0% with the use of PAPs when compared to the control. |
| 32) T allele was overrepresented in the cases compared to the controls (58% vs 42%; P = |
| 33) cidence of AO and postoperative pain when compared to the controls (AO: relative ris |
| |