| 1) ted in each specimen by microbial culture method was 2 (1, 2) types, which was signi |
| 2) oliferation activity detection with CCK-8 method was 6, while the sample numbers in |
| 3) Methods: The experimental research method was adopted. |
| 4) Methods: The experimental research method was adopted. |
| 5) Methods: The experimental research method was adopted. |
| 6) Methods: The experimental research method was adopted. |
| 7) Methods: The scoping review method was adopted. |
| 8) The bibliometrics method was applied to analyze the number o |
| 9) Methods: The experiment research method was applied. |
| 10) Methods: The experiment research method was applied. |
| 11) Methods: The experimental research method was applied. |
| 12) Methods: The experimental research method was applied. |
| 13) Methods: The experimental research method was applied. |
| 14) rospective randomized controlled research method was applied. |
| 15) Methods: The retrospective cohort study method was applied. |
| 16) Methods: The retrospective cohort study method was applied. |
| 17) ds: The retrospective observational study method was applied. |
| 18) The reporting method was based on the PRISMA extension f |
| 19) raceptives among SIYP; the commonly known method was condom with a few also aware of |
| 20) xtension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) method was conducted across 4 databases: P |
| 21) Methods: A retrospective cohort study method was conducted. |
| 22) A single center cross-sectional research method was conducted. |
| 23) que, a simple high-throughput UHPLC-MS/MS method was developed and validated for the |
| 24) d dispersive micro solid-phase extraction method was developed for the extraction an |
| 25) s was communication; the primary delivery method was didactics and the outcome evalu |
| 26) symptom management; the primary delivery method was didactics, and the outcome asse |
| 27) The proposed method was evaluated on a cohort of 65 HN |
| 28) The scope of the method was further explored in the estradi |
| 29) Finally, the proposed method was performed on different soymilk |
| 30) In addition, the tension method was performed with 30% of 1RM and t |
| 31) Methods: The systematic review method was performed. |
| 32) The most commonly used sampling method was purposive sampling (94, 47.5%), |
| 33) segmentation performance of the proposed method was quantitatively evaluated using |
| |