
| 1) Significant increase was detected in AST a |
| 2) In the ulnar artery, a significant increase (P < 0.05) was see |
| 3) miR-192 in human hepatoma cells caused a significant increase in Rab27a, Rab35, syn |
| 4) Pigs in the SO group showed a significant increase in arachidonic acid ( |
| 5) ost-controlled cortical impact there is a significant increase in connectivity stren |
| 6) Diabetic rats exhibited a significant increase in food intake, lipid |
| 7) ogramming, which was characterized by (1) significant increase in glucose uptake and |
| 8) pheral blood mononuclear cells revealed a significant increase in markers of inflamm |
| 9) Nine studies found a significant increase in perceived social s |
| 10) In addition, CYP1A2 KO rats exhibited a significant increase in serum cholesterol |
| 11) Pathway enrichment analysis showed a significant increase in several histamine |
| 12) In the last decade, there has been a significant increase in the adoption of mo |
| 13) In MK571 pre-treated mice, a significant increase in the blood exposure |
| 14) Furthermore, there was a significant increase in the expression of |
| 15) Five studies documented a significant increase in the uptake of cerv |
| 16) Notably there has been a significant increase in the use of digital |
| 17) cular endothelial cells (HUVECs) showed a significant increase in tube length when e |
| 18) Our results revealed a significant increase of cell-free mitochon |
| 19) decreased significantly while there was a significant increase of the serum immunogl |
| 20) While a significant increase was observed due to w |
| 21) Significant differences were not maintaine |
| 22) d holdout sets, respectively, without any significant differences (P > 0.05). |
| 23) Analyses demonstrated significant differences among recruitment |
| 24) ross acuity levels, with no statistically significant differences between higher- an |
| 25) tion, concreteness and imageability, with significant differences between nouns, ver |
| 26) Transcriptomic analysis confirmed significant differences between xenografte |
| 27) cipants did not demonstrate statistically significant differences beyond eight chann |
| 28) anipulation effects, but no statistically significant differences in accuracy, respo |
| 29) ts with hEDS and HSD; however, there were significant differences in autonomic sympt |
| 30) expression Quantitative Trait Loci showed significant differences in expression betw |
| 31) Trait Loci downstream of the gene showed significant differences in expression betw |
| 32) Transcriptomic analysis identified significant differences in gene expression |
| 33) h time points there were no statistically significant differences in inflammation. |
add keyword