108) sis of variance (ANOVA), Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD)). |
109) dible 98.6%, representing a statistically significant difference (P < .05). |
110) ence of complete healing did not show any significant difference (P = 0·69, 0· |
111) istorical controls showed a statistically significant difference (t = -5.19, df = 13 |
112) s produced heavy lambs (≥4.5 kg) with a significant difference between BSA4 and BS |
113) and treatment time of DDVP, and there was significant difference between control gro |
114) There was no significant difference between patients wi |
115) for mandibular implants, and there was no significant difference between the 2 jaws. |
116) up (p < 0.001), while there was no significant difference between the Radix F |
117) However, spirometric measures showed no significant difference between the exposed |
118) ve a small reduction in BMI, there was no significant difference between the groups. |
119) diated group (2.3-fold), but there was no significant difference between the non-irr |
120) In the experimental donkeys, there was no significant difference between the pre- an |
121) sults showed that there was statistically significant difference between those who h |
122) In the solution culture, there was no significant difference in bioavailability |
123) Yet, there exists no significant difference in genotype frequen |
124) No significant difference in gingival inflamm |
125) However, no significant difference in growth parameter |
126) No significant difference in reduction in blo |
127) Filtek Silorane present no statistically significant difference in shear bond stren |
128) No significant difference in survival time wa |
129) The significant difference in the QOL as perce |
130) There was a significant difference in the epithelium h |
131) There was no statistically significant difference in the mean CD4 cou |
132) However, there was no significant difference in the number of ax |
133) There was no statistically significant difference in the quality of s |
134) There was a statistically significant difference in the volume of th |
135) There was no statistically significant difference in wasting and stun |
136) pared for both groups and a statistically significant difference was found in the LP |
137) No significant difference was found in the nu |
138) A significant difference was found in the pe |
139) However, no significant difference was found in the to |
140) No statistically significant difference was noted in time t |
|