125) sed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. |
126) rom each site and was used for histologic analysis. |
127) ycles is incorporated into finite element analysis. |
128) lliative care was conceptualized from the analysis. |
129) scents in California were included in the analysis. |
130) ) and matched controls were available for analysis. |
131) ion was divided into different groups for analysis. |
132) responders, are utilized in the efficacy analysis. |
133) computer-assisted histomorphometric image analysis. |
134) SD was analyzed using logistic regression analysis. |
135) sed by leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance analysis. |
136) re used for MDR1 real-time PCR expression analysis. |
137) tive complications were excluded from the analysis. |
138) 159 acute care hospitals were used in the analysis. |
139) with Mann-Whitney U test and correlation analysis. |
140) oduction as detected and confirmed by TLC analysis. |
141) efined food groups by principal component analysis. |
142) arity calculation and principle component analysis. |
143) rediction of NHL survival in a univariate analysis. |
144) ing immunohistochemistry and Western blot analysis. |
145) luded and 60 ulcers included in the final analysis. |
146) erified by ELISA, RT-PCR and western blot analysis. |
147) essed by means of computerised planimetry analysis. |
148) iated with undernutrition in multivariate analysis. |
149) an interest for applications in bacterial analysis. |
150) confirmed by UV scanning, HPLC and GC-MS analysis. |
151) was analyzed using theory-driven thematic analysis. |
152) into English and audio-recorded for later analysis. |
153) ibed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. |
154) tin zymography and milk-casein agar plate analysis. |
155) by immunohistochemistry and western blot analysis. |
156) nd 22 323 controls) remained in the final analysis. |
157) nvestigated via microarray and mutational analysis. |
|