kwic
group
group
right
on
off
352
1
100
500
strict
ELIZA cgi-bash version rev. 1.90
- Medical English LInking keywords finder for the PubMed Zipped Archive (ELIZA) -
return
kwic search for group out of >500 occurrences
385944 occurrences (No.46 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [no cache] 500 found
[frequency of next (right) word to group]
385944 occurrences (No.46 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [no cache] 500 found
| 352) Intervention group patients (n = 219) had Mepilex(®) B |
| 353) ival analysis indicated that intervention group patients had a hazard ratio of 0·19 |
| 354) The nonindexed group presented higher initial preload (6. |
| 355) The SP group presented the best results, followed |
| 356) d within the mediums that include control group that has only DIM, negative control |
| 357) MDA level decreased significantly in the group that received DZN plus 25 mg crocin |
| 358) cise; mothers attended an open discussion group while the children attended their se |
| 359) Cd-treated rats compared with the control group, while the addition of PA in diet de |
| 360) albino male rats were divided into eight groups (10 rats for each group): control ( |
| 361) ay was also significantly lower in the PU group (166 versus 270 days, P = 0·02). |
| 362) analyses identify the double extreme (XX) group (18 people) and other 6 groups with |
| 363) y greater than that of the non-irradiated group (2.3-fold), but there was no signifi |
| 364) g the cases (6.3%) than among the control group (2.4%). |
| 365) creases were recorded for the diode laser group (2.61 °C), followed by the Er:YAG l |
| 366) ines to 88.3% to 91.9% in the middle-aged group (20-50 years), and appeared to be hi |
| 367) alues were significantly higher in the BO group (25.60% ± 5.89%) compared to the CP |
| 368) and randomly allocated to case or control group (32 per group). |
| 369) ssets approach, (3) empowerment of target group, (4) enabling of policy-makers and p |
| 370) cally significant higher in the alloplast group (47.15% ± 8.5%) as compared to the |
| 371) was significantly lower than the non PUs group (94 versus 414 days, respectively) ( |
| 372) curacy in discriminating CRC from healthy group (AUC: 0.866 and 0.897 for training a |
| 373) ervention (SMI) (IG) or a waiting control group (CG). |
| 374) neralization occurred in the Nd:YAG laser group (G2, 26.15% ± 1.94). |
| 375) Group (I) gavaged with corn oil (control g |
| 376) dertaken by the Inclusive Design Research Group (IDRG) are used to illustrate the pr |
| 377) up drinking clear water) and experimental group (Pb; group exposed to low doses of l |
| 378) dressing changes in the conventional NPWT group (P < 0·001). |
| 379) The Veterinary Cooperative Oncology Group (VCOG) membership consensus document |
| 380) ee equal groups: the animals in the first group (control) were fed with a standard r |
| 381) groups: a monolayer, 7 day culture sheet group (group M); a triple-layered, 7 day c |
| 382) n administration policies: a routine iron group (n=2184) received 60 mg of ferrous s |
| 383) als were divided into a negative pressure group (negative pressure of -125 mmHg appl |
| 384) urface treatments as follows: one control group (no treatment), one air abrasion gro |
[
right
kwic]
| (1)49 *null* | (15)7  received |
(29)3 II |
(44)2 difference |
| (2)33 was |
(16)5 at |
(30)3 after |
(45)2 displayed |
| (3)29 and |
(17)5 for |
(31)3 comprised |
(46)2 dynamics-based |
| (4)25 of |
(18)5 the |
(32)3 in |
(47)2 exhibited |
| (5)16 compared |
(19)5 to |
(33)3 when |
(48)2 however, |
| (6)12 A |
(20)4 (p |
(34)2 (30 |
(49)2 improved |
| (7)12 were |
(21)4 B |
(35)2 (n |
(50)2 included |
| (8)11 discussions |
(22)4 C |
(37)2 B, |
(51)2 intervention |
| (9)10 than |
(23)4 differences |
(38)2 III |
(52)2 interventions |
| (10)9 I |
(24)4 or |
(39)2 V |
(53)2 interviews |
| (11)8 had |
(25)3 1, |
(40)2 a |
(54)2 patients |
| (12)8 showed |
(26)3 2 |
(41)2 as |
(55)2 presented |
| (13)8 with |
(27)3 4 |
(42)2 contains |
(56)2 that |
| (14)7 1 |
(28)3 A, |
(43)2 demonstrated |
add keyword
--- WordNet output for group ---