370) optosis and, thereafter, the hit compound effect was validated in vivo in a sub-acut |
371) Effect size analysis for known potential e |
372) r risk (RR=0.83, p<0.05), with a large effect size (Hedges g=0.55), but high hete |
373) 1.0 (RR=0.86, p<0.017, N=24) and large effect size (Hedges g=0.66), but did not d |
374) was not significant and had a negligible effect size (RR=1.12, p=0.3, Hedges g=0.02 |
375) e no longer significantly associated with effect size after adjusting for covariates |
376) The magnitude of effect size analysis for known potential e |
377) re replicated in Project Viva with strong effect size and remained in the meta-analy |
378) leveraged the second simulation to derive effect size guidelines for network loading |
379) Although some studies reported the effect size of the factors, the values wer |
380) d that for the SA model, either the slope effect size or the autocorrelation credibl |
381) Statistical Manual (DSM)-III had a larger effect size than measures based on DSM-IV |
382) tary sources was associated with a larger effect size than support perceived from mi |
383) Retrodictive validity, i.e., effect size to distinguish CS+ and CS-, wa |
384) Standardized effect sizes (Cohen's d) were calculated u |
385) nclude differences in allele frequencies, effect sizes and linkage-disequilibrium pa |
386) Our EA cohort, while showing similar effect sizes at variants within MAGI1, had |
387) Research studies that develop slope effect sizes for SCEDs should consider the |
388) Peer effects with nontrivial effect sizes likely have practical implica |
389) (NLR) (p < 0.05), and the estimated effect sizes of PCB on the epigenome were |
390) Standardized effect sizes of the intervention were smal |
391) altitude increases suicide risk, although effect sizes range from very small to smal |
392) Aggregated effect sizes via random-effect meta-analys |
393) hese findings show only small to moderate effect sizes. |
394) to result in the most stable and highest effect sizes. |
395) However, the observed interim effect is a random variable and thus does |
396) This ligand-selective effect is achieved through allosteric comm |
397) ke in the presence of thymidine, and this effect is dependent upon TYMP expression. |
398) Surprisingly, this effect is independent of TMEFF2 expression |
399) However, free curcumin for anticancer effect is limited due to its low water sol |
400) with age-matched men and this protective effect is lost with menopause, suggesting |
401) It remains to be clarified whether the effect is mediated by the inhibition of C- |
402) anulosa-like KGN cells, we show that this effect is not the result of increased AR g |
|