403) re to lanthanoids (Ln) elicits an adverse response such as oxidative injury of lung |
404) s can be assessed on the basis of a viral response such as viral decay rate or viral |
405) For item response theory (IRT) models, which belong |
406) equate recovery of information using item response theory methods, stable test-retes |
407) The assessment of response validity is now considered an imp |
408) One way for assessing response validity is with performance vali |
409) with hypoxia network and oxidative stress response were upregulated after the lactat |
410) y) and processing style (stimulus- versus response-focused) were manipulated. |
411) ctive process, might induce an autoimmune response with potential impairment of seme |
412) imating the sensitivity of the mechanical response with the variation of basic geome |
413) elation analysis revealed two patterns of response: (1) trees on two sites in the up |
414) e studied using the auditory steady-state response (ASSR), indexing cortical activit |
415) mpled at 10 pm and the cortisol awakening response (CAR) the following morning. |
416) or cervical cancer using the early growth response (Egr-1) promoter to control sodiu |
417) y data from the participatory disease and response (PDSR) database revealed that the |
418) Photoparoxysmal response (PPR) is an EEG trait of spike an |
419) The Proportion of Similar Response (PSR) method will be described an |
420) lysis yields a quadratic model with MI as response (R2 = 0.96, p < 0.001 |
421) BE was observed through the radioadaptive response (RAR), which was developed agains |
422) In contrast, the tumor response (in terms of both papillomas and |
423) biopsies predicted pathological complete response (pCR) (n=31 patients, P=0.0486), |
424) scriptomic methods, only the early growth response 1 gene-coding for a transcription |
425) ination therapy and sustained therapeutic response 12 months post-therapy. |
426) ful Situations, Religious-COPE and Coping Response Inventory were frequently mention |
427) To lessen the host response, Matrigel was omitted from the ma |
428) ent intensification with re-evaluation of response according to symptoms, does not i |
429) The changes may be an adaptive response aimed at keeping high levels of l |
430) posure was at levels that recent exposure-response analyses suggest may not result i |
431) Positive response appearance time was 15.1±14.0 mi |
432) g of bone lesions and increasing the bone response around alloplastic materials. |
433) f great interest to manipulate the immune response, as well as for accurately delive |
434) The data did not suggest a dose-response association. |
435) Thus, significant dose-response associations were found linking h |
|