ELIZA

return kwic search for different out of >500 occurrences
683276 occurrences (No.7 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [cache]

70) This review aims to search and critically discuss instruments used to assess HL and PTHL in people with type 2 diabetes and propose their use in different settings.

--- ABSTRACT ---

PMID:34646807 DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2021.747807

2021 Frontiers in public health

* The Instruments Used to Assess Health Literacy and Pharmacotherapy Literacy of Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 Patients: A Scoping Review.

- Background: Patients with chronic diseases, like diabetes need to continuously perform tasks associated with self-management especially with medications they use. It is shown that the patients with diabetes with limited HL and PTHL cannot read medication labels correctly, may misuse their medications, spend much more on therapy and generally have difficulties in understanding printed care instructions and perceiving health advice and warnings. There has been an increasing demand for valid and reliable instruments for HL and PTHL assessment in this population. This review aims to search and critically discuss instruments used to assess HL and PTHL in people with type 2 diabetes and propose their use in different settings. Methods: Authors conducted a comprehensive, electronic search of original studies using a structured approach of the Scopus and PubMed databases, during November and the first 2 weeks of December 2020 to find relevant papers. The review was conducted in accordance with the Cochrane guidelines and the reporting was based on the PRISMA-ScR. The comparison of instruments was made by utilizing a comparison model related to their structure, measurement scope, range, psychometric properties, validation, strengths, and limitations. Results: The final number of included studies was 24, extracting the following identified instruments: Korean Functional Test HL, NVS, FCCHL, HLS-EU-47, TOFLHA, S-TOFHLA, REALM-R, 3-brief SQ, REALM, HLQ and DNT-15. In all, FCCHL and 3-brief SQ are shown with the broadest measurement scopes. They are quick, easy, and inexpensive for administration. FCCHL can be considered the most useful and comprehensive instrument to screen for inadequate HL. The limitation is that the English version is not validated. Three-brief SQ has many advantages in comparison to other instruments, including that it is less likely to cause anxiety and shame. These instruments can be considered the best for measuring functional HL in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 and other chronic diseases. PTHL instruments (REALM and DNT-15) did not find the best application in this population. Conclusions: The future research should be directed in validation of the FCCHL in English and establishing of the structural validity of this questionnaire. Developing a specific PTHL questionnaire for this population will be of great help in management of their disease.

--- ABSTRACT END ---

[
right
kwic]

[frequency of next (right) word to different]

(1)21 types	(18)3 combinations	(35)2 applications	(52)2 languages,
(2)8 methods	(19)3 contexts	(36)2 areas	(53)2 levels:
(3)8 treatment	(20)3 databases	(37)2 between	(54)2 lipid
(4)7 from	(21)3 definitions	(38)2 cell	(55)2 methodological
(5)6 levels	(22)3 developmental	(39)2 cognitive	(56)2 methods,
(6)6 studies	(23)3 drugs	(40)2 communities	(57)2 modes
(7)5 aspects	(24)3 interventions	(41)2 components	(58)2 movement
(8)5 in	(25)3 models	(42)2 concentrations	(59)2 phenotypes
(9)5 settings	(26)3 populations,	(43)2 conditions	(60)2 physical
(10)4 clinical	(27)3 research	(44)2 consensus	(61)2 probiotics
(11)4 countries	(28)3 scales	(45)2 countries,	(62)2 situations
(12)4 factors	(29)3 surfaces	(46)2 designs	(63)2 stakeholders
(13)4 forms	(30)3 than	(47)2 diagnostic	(64)2 study
(14)4 mechanisms	(31)3 ways	(48)2 environments	(65)2 surface
(15)4 populations	(32)2 DNA	(49)2 ethnic	(66)2 techniques
(16)4 strategies	(33)2 UER	(50)2 fields	(67)2 tissues
(17)3 approaches	(34)2 age	(51)2 global

add keyword

--- WordNet output for different --- =>いろいろな, 違った, 異なった, 様々の, 種々の, 異なる, 変わった Overview of adj different The adj different has 5 senses (first 4 from tagged texts) 1. (88) different -- (unlike in nature or quality or form or degree; "took different approaches to the problem"; "came to a different conclusion"; "different parts of the country"; "on different sides of the issue"; "this meeting was different from the earlier one") 2. (41) different -- (distinctly separate from the first; "that's another (or different) issue altogether") 3. (2) different -- (differing from all others; not ordinary; "advertising that strives continually to be different"; "this new music is certainly different but I don't really like it") 4. (1) unlike, dissimilar, different -- (marked by dissimilarity; "for twins they are very unlike"; "people are profoundly different") 5. different -- (distinct or separate; "each interviewed different members of the community") --- WordNet end ---