kwic
group
group
right
off
ON
115
1
100
500
strict
ELIZA cgi-bash version rev. 1.90
- Medical English LInking keywords finder for the PubMed Zipped Archive (ELIZA) -
return
kwic search for group out of >500 occurrences
385944 occurrences (No.46 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [cache]
--- ABSTRACT ---
--- ABSTRACT END ---
[frequency of next (right) word to group]
385944 occurrences (No.46 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [cache]
| 115) A group of 40 edentulous men, comprising of 20 nondiabetics and 20 controlled type II diabetics between the ages of 50-65 years, were enrolled in the study. |
| PMID:23834616 DOI:10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00248 |
| 2015 The Journal of oral implantology |
| * Assessment of Maxillary and Mandibular Bone Density in Controlled Type II Diabetes: A Computed Tomography Study. |
| - This study was undertaken to compare the bone density in nondiabetic and controlled type II diabetes patients using spiral computed tomography. A group of 40 edentulous men, comprising of 20 nondiabetics and 20 controlled type II diabetics between the ages of 50-65 years, were enrolled in the study. Glycemic control of the diabetic patients was assessed by glycosylated hemoglobin level. The controlled diabetic group had an HbA1c level between 6.1-8%. A radiographic stent was prepared by using chemically cured resin. Bone densities at trabecular, buccal, and lingual cortical regions of maxillary and mandibular edentulous arches were measured by a tomography machine. Mean bone density measurements were recorded in Hounsfield units. The data thus obtained from 10 sites of maxillary and mandibular arches were tabulated and analyzed using SPSS statistical software. This study showed no significant changes in bone density between the controlled diabetic and nondiabetic subjects. Within the limitation of this study, it can be concluded that bone density does not seem to be affected in controlled type II diabetics. |
[
right
kwic]
| (1)49 *null* | (15)7  received |
(29)3 II |
(44)2 difference |
| (2)33 was |
(16)5 at |
(30)3 after |
(45)2 displayed |
| (3)29 and |
(17)5 for |
(31)3 comprised |
(46)2 dynamics-based |
| (4)25 of |
(18)5 the |
(32)3 in |
(47)2 exhibited |
| (5)16 compared |
(19)5 to |
(33)3 when |
(48)2 however, |
| (6)12 A |
(20)4 (p |
(34)2 (30 |
(49)2 improved |
| (7)12 were |
(21)4 B |
(35)2 (n |
(50)2 included |
| (8)11 discussions |
(22)4 C |
(37)2 B, |
(51)2 intervention |
| (9)10 than |
(23)4 differences |
(38)2 III |
(52)2 interventions |
| (10)9 I |
(24)4 or |
(39)2 V |
(53)2 interviews |
| (11)8 had |
(25)3 1, |
(40)2 a |
(54)2 patients |
| (12)8 showed |
(26)3 2 |
(41)2 as |
(55)2 presented |
| (13)8 with |
(27)3 4 |
(42)2 contains |
(56)2 that |
| (14)7 1 |
(28)3 A, |
(43)2 demonstrated |
add keyword
--- WordNet output for group ---