kwic
group
group
right
off
ON
29
1
100
500
strict
ELIZA cgi-bash version rev. 1.90
- Medical English LInking keywords finder for the PubMed Zipped Archive (ELIZA) -
return
kwic search for group out of >500 occurrences
385944 occurrences (No.46 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [no cache] 500 found
--- ABSTRACT ---
--- ABSTRACT END ---
[frequency of next (right) word to group]
385944 occurrences (No.46 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [no cache] 500 found
| 29) The IOM-2009 nutritional classification, which does not take into account age and gender, tends to overestimate the proportion of underweight adolescents, especially in the younger-age group. |
| PMID:23230989 DOI:10.1111/mcn.12016 |
| 2015 Maternal & child nutrition |
| * Nutritional assessment of pregnant adolescents: comparison of two popular classification systems. |
| - The objective of this study was to assess the degree of concordance between two popular classification systems [the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-2000 and the Institute of Medicine (IOM)-2009] used to categorise the nutritional status of pregnant adolescents. This cross-sectional study involved 327 pregnant adolescents (10-19 years) booking for antenatal care at a single public maternity in São Paulo, Brazil. Participants were classified into one of four categories, by both systems according to their pre-pregnancy body mass index and age. The CDC-2000 system classified significantly fewer pregnant adolescents as underweight (3.7% vs. 12.5%, P < 0.0001) and significantly more adolescents as normal-weight (86.8% vs. 75.6%, P = 0.0003) than the IOM-2009 system. The distribution of the adolescents in the two systems differed significantly. The global rate of discordance was 13.5%. The overall concordance between the two systems was marginally good (K = 0.63), being moderate for younger (<16 years) adolescents (K = 0.52). Approximately one in every seven pregnant adolescent would be classified in a non-corresponding category if the IOM-2009 classification was used instead of the CDC-2000 classification. The IOM-2009 nutritional classification, which does not take into account age and gender, tends to overestimate the proportion of underweight adolescents, especially in the younger-age group. The use of this classification system can lead to recommendations of higher gestational weight gain in a substantial proportion of pregnant adolescents, which could predispose to post-partum weight retention and future obesity. |
[
right
kwic]
| (1)49 *null* | (15)7  received |
(29)3 II |
(44)2 difference |
| (2)33 was |
(16)5 at |
(30)3 after |
(45)2 displayed |
| (3)29 and |
(17)5 for |
(31)3 comprised |
(46)2 dynamics-based |
| (4)25 of |
(18)5 the |
(32)3 in |
(47)2 exhibited |
| (5)16 compared |
(19)5 to |
(33)3 when |
(48)2 however, |
| (6)12 A |
(20)4 (p |
(34)2 (30 |
(49)2 improved |
| (7)12 were |
(21)4 B |
(35)2 (n |
(50)2 included |
| (8)11 discussions |
(22)4 C |
(37)2 B, |
(51)2 intervention |
| (9)10 than |
(23)4 differences |
(38)2 III |
(52)2 interventions |
| (10)9 I |
(24)4 or |
(39)2 V |
(53)2 interviews |
| (11)8 had |
(25)3 1, |
(40)2 a |
(54)2 patients |
| (12)8 showed |
(26)3 2 |
(41)2 as |
(55)2 presented |
| (13)8 with |
(27)3 4 |
(42)2 contains |
(56)2 that |
| (14)7 1 |
(28)3 A, |
(43)2 demonstrated |
add keyword
--- WordNet output for group ---