ELIZA cgi-bash version rev. 1.90
- Medical English LInking keywords finder for the PubMed Zipped Archive (ELIZA) -

return kwic search for important out of >500 occurrences
448856 occurrences (No.37 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [no cache] 500 found
259) There is evidence that the two types of assessments can show important differences.
--- ABSTRACT ---
PMID:23939724 DOI:10.1177/1367493513496909
2015 Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community
* Comparison of utility scores from the Visual Analog Scale and Health Utilities Index 3 in children following pediatric intensive care unit admission.
- Indirect and direct health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures are intended to assess the same underlying constructs. There is evidence that the two types of assessments can show important differences. We assessed the agreement between the utilities of direct and indirect HRQoL measurements in children following pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission. We collected Health Utilities Index 3 (HUI-3) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ratings of children who were urgently admitted to the PICU of a university-affiliated pediatric hospital at ICU admission (baseline) and one month post-ICU admission. The mean (SD) VAS converted standard gamble and HUI-3 utilities were 0.82 (±0.19) and 0.70 (±0.39), respectively, at baseline (n = 51), and 0.81 (±0.15) and 0.58 (±0.39) at one month (n = 36). The VAS utilities were significantly greater than the HUI-3 utilities (p = 0.009). At baseline, the intraclass coefficient (95% confidence interval) was 0.49 (0.25-0.68), representing moderate agreement, and at one month, was 0.18 (-0.87 to 0.45), representing negligible agreement. There were significant differences between indirect and direct measures, and inconsistent agreement between utilities derived from the two measures. These data illustrate the potential impact of HRQoL assessment techniques on economic analyses used to inform health policy decision-making for pediatric critical care.
--- ABSTRACT END ---
[
right
kwic]
[frequency of next (right) word to important]
(1)65 role (16)4 data (31)2 alternative (46)2 indicator
(2)37 for (17)4 differences (32)2 aspect (47)2 mechanism
(3)34 to (18)3 approach (33)2 baseline (48)2 model
(4)28 in (19)3 causes (34)2 because (49)2 molecular
(5)15 implications (20)3 clinical (35)2 bivalve, (50)2 not
(6)11 factor (21)3 findings (36)2 complication (51)2 pathogen
(7)9 *null* (22)3 genes (37)2 components (52)2 phenomenon
(8)9 and (23)3 health (38)2 consequences (53)2 physiological
(9)8 determinants (24)3 human (39)2 contributor (54)2 protective
(10)8 roles (25)3 insights (40)2 coping (55)2 route
(11)7 factors (26)3 policy (41)2 determinant (56)2 standard
(12)6 cause (27)3 predictors (42)2 economic (57)2 step
(13)5 component (28)3 public (43)2 element (58)2 strategic
(14)5 risk (29)3 when (44)2 fish (59)2 subset
(15)4 as (30)2 DNA (45)2 function (60)2 target

add keyword

--- WordNet output for important --- =>重要な, 有力な, 重大な, 大切な Overview of adj important The adj important has 5 senses (first 4 from tagged texts) 1. (146) important, of import -- (of great significance or value; "important people"; "the important questions of the day") 2. (4) significant, important -- (important in effect or meaning; "a significant change in tax laws"; "a significant change in the Constitution"; "a significant contribution"; "significant details"; "statistically significant") 3. (2) crucial, important -- (of extreme importance; vital to the resolution of a crisis; "a crucial moment in his career"; "a crucial election"; "a crucial issue for women") 4. (1) authoritative, important -- (having authority or ascendancy or influence; "an important official"; "the captain's authoritative manner") 5. important -- (having or suggesting a consciousness of high position; "recited the decree with an important air"; "took long important strides in the direction of his office") --- WordNet end ---