ELIZA

return kwic search for over out of >500 occurrences
295512 occurrences (No.81 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [no cache] 500 found

18) Over the years, NIST has done a great deal of research into the issue of sample contamination and its removal and elimination and some of this work is reviewed and discussed here.

--- ABSTRACT ---

PMID:24166540 DOI:10.1002/sca.21124

2015 Scanning

* Does your SEM really tell the truth? How would you know? Part 2.

- The scanning electron microscope (SEM) has gone through a tremendous evolution to become indispensable for many and diverse scientific and industrial applications. The improvements have significantly enriched and augmented the overall SEM performance and have made the instrument far easier to operate. But, the ease of operation also might lead, through operator complacency, to poor results. In addition, the user friendliness has seemingly reduced the need for thorough operator training for using these complex instruments. One might then conclude that the SEM is just a very expensive digital camera or another peripheral device for a computer. Hence, a person using the instrument may be lulled into thinking that all of the potential pitfalls have been eliminated and they believe everything they see on the micrograph is always correct. But, this may not be the case. An earlier paper (Part 1), discussed some of the potential issues related to signal generation in the SEM, instrument calibration, electron beam interactions and the need for physics-based modeling to understand the actual image formation mechanisms. All these were summed together in a discussion of how these issues effect measurements made with the instrument. This second paper discusses another major issue confronting the microscopist: electron-beam-induced specimen contamination. Over the years, NIST has done a great deal of research into the issue of sample contamination and its removal and elimination and some of this work is reviewed and discussed here.

--- ABSTRACT END ---

[
right
kwic]

[frequency of next (right) word to over]

(1)145 the	(8)6 their	(15)3 four	(22)2 40
(2)70 time	(9)4 6	(16)3 longer	(23)2 OP
(3)67 a	(10)4 in	(17)3 other	(24)2 another
(4)12 time,	(11)3 1	(18)3 placebo	(25)2 collagen)
(5)9 of	(12)3 12	(19)2 2	(26)2 left
(6)7 and	(13)3 24	(20)2 30	(27)2 long
(7)6 an	(14)3 65	(21)2 4	(28)2 settlement

add keyword

--- WordNet output for over --- =>1.超えて, 一面に, 移って, 始めから終わりまで, 終わって, を支配して, の間, しながら, 倒れて, の上に, を覆って, を越えて, の向こう側に, より多く, 2.もう一度, 繰り返して Overview of noun over The noun over has 1 sense (no senses from tagged texts) 1. over -- ((cricket) the division of play during which six balls are bowled at the batsman by one player from the other team from the same end of the pitch) Overview of adj over The adj over has 1 sense (first 1 from tagged texts) 1. (21) complete, concluded, ended, over, all over, terminated -- (having come or been brought to a conclusion; "the harvesting was complete"; "the affair is over, ended, finished"; "the abruptly terminated interview") Overview of adv over The adv over has 5 senses (first 3 from tagged texts) 1. (23) over -- (at or to a point across intervening space etc.; "come over and see us some time"; "over there") 2. (2) over -- (throughout an area; "he is known the world over") 3. (1) over, o'er -- (throughout a period of time; "stay over the weekend") 4. over -- (beyond the top or upper surface or edge; forward from an upright position; "a roof that hangs over";) 5. all over, over -- (over the entire area; "the wallpaper was covered all over with flowers"; "she ached all over"; "everything was dusted over with a fine layer of soot") --- WordNet end ---