ELIZA

return kwic search for over out of >500 occurrences
295512 occurrences (No.81 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [no cache] 500 found

306) Importantly, several SNA measures and the global network index predicted diffusion over and above the effect of participation rate and representativeness.

--- ABSTRACT ---

PMID:24482140 DOI:10.1007/s11121-014-0465-3

2015 Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research

* Adolescent peer networks and the potential for the diffusion of intervention effects.

- Many evaluation studies assess the direct effect of an intervention on individuals, but there is an increasing interest in clarifying how interventions can impact larger social settings. One process that can lead to these setting-level effects is diffusion, in which intervention effects spread from participants to non-participants. Diffusion may be particularly important when intervention participation rates are low, as they often are in universal family based prevention programs. We drew on socialization and diffusion theories to articulate how features of peer networks may promote the diffusion of intervention effects. Then, we tested the measurement properties of ten social network analytic (SNA) measures of diffusion potential. Data were from 42 networks (n = 5,784 students) involved in the PROSPER intervention trial. All families of sixth-grade students were invited to participate in a family based substance use prevention program, and 17 % of the families attended at least one session. We identified two dimensions of network structure--social integration and location of intervention participants in their peer network--that might promote diffusion. Analyses demonstrated that these SNA measures varied across networks and were distinct from traditional analytic measures that do not require social network analysis (i.e., participation rate, how representative participants are of the broader population). Importantly, several SNA measures and the global network index predicted diffusion over and above the effect of participation rate and representativeness. We conclude by recommending which SNA measures may be the most promising for studying how networks promote the diffusion of intervention effects and lead to setting-level effects.

--- ABSTRACT END ---

[
right
kwic]

[frequency of next (right) word to over]

(1)145 the	(8)6 their	(15)3 four	(22)2 40
(2)70 time	(9)4 6	(16)3 longer	(23)2 OP
(3)67 a	(10)4 in	(17)3 other	(24)2 another
(4)12 time,	(11)3 1	(18)3 placebo	(25)2 collagen)
(5)9 of	(12)3 12	(19)2 2	(26)2 left
(6)7 and	(13)3 24	(20)2 30	(27)2 long
(7)6 an	(14)3 65	(21)2 4	(28)2 settlement

add keyword

--- WordNet output for over --- =>1.超えて, 一面に, 移って, 始めから終わりまで, 終わって, を支配して, の間, しながら, 倒れて, の上に, を覆って, を越えて, の向こう側に, より多く, 2.もう一度, 繰り返して Overview of noun over The noun over has 1 sense (no senses from tagged texts) 1. over -- ((cricket) the division of play during which six balls are bowled at the batsman by one player from the other team from the same end of the pitch) Overview of adj over The adj over has 1 sense (first 1 from tagged texts) 1. (21) complete, concluded, ended, over, all over, terminated -- (having come or been brought to a conclusion; "the harvesting was complete"; "the affair is over, ended, finished"; "the abruptly terminated interview") Overview of adv over The adv over has 5 senses (first 3 from tagged texts) 1. (23) over -- (at or to a point across intervening space etc.; "come over and see us some time"; "over there") 2. (2) over -- (throughout an area; "he is known the world over") 3. (1) over, o'er -- (throughout a period of time; "stay over the weekend") 4. over -- (beyond the top or upper surface or edge; forward from an upright position; "a roof that hangs over";) 5. all over, over -- (over the entire area; "the wallpaper was covered all over with flowers"; "she ached all over"; "everything was dusted over with a fine layer of soot") --- WordNet end ---