kwic
significant
significant
right
off
ON
126
1
100
500
strict
ELIZA cgi-bash version rev. 1.90
- Medical English LInking keywords finder for the PubMed Zipped Archive (ELIZA) -
return
kwic search for significant out of >500 occurrences
583352 occurrences (No.14 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [no cache] 500 found
--- ABSTRACT ---
--- ABSTRACT END ---
[frequency of next (right) word to significant]
583352 occurrences (No.14 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [no cache] 500 found
| 126) No significant difference in reduction in blood flow could be observed between the two groups. |
| PMID:23517436 DOI:10.1111/iwj.12056 |
| 2015 International wound journal |
| * Comparative study of the microvascular blood flow in the intestinal wall, wound contraction and fluid evacuation during negative pressure wound therapy in laparostomy using the V.A.C. abdominal dressing and the ABThera open abdomen negative pressure therapy system. |
| - This study aimed to compare the changes in microvascular blood flow in the small intestinal wall, wound contraction and fluid evacuation, using the established V.A.C. abdominal dressing (VAC dressing) and a new abdominal dressing, the ABThera open abdomen negative pressure therapy system (ABThera dressing), in negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). Midline incisions were made in 12 pigs that were subjected to treatment with NPWT using the VAC or ABThera dressing. The microvascular blood flow in the intestinal wall was measured before and after the application of topical negative pressures of −50, −75 and −125mmHg using laser Doppler velocimetry. Wound contraction and fluid evacuation were also measured. Baseline blood flow was defined as 100% in all settings. The blood flow was significantly reduced to 64·6±6·7% (P <0·05) after the application of −50mmHg using the VAC dressing, and to 65·3±9·6% (P <0·05) after the application of −50mmHg using the ABThera dressing. The blood flow was significantly reduced to 39·6±6·7% (P <0·05) after the application of −125mmHg using VAC and to 40·5±6·2% (P <0·05) after the application of −125mmHg using ABThera. No significant difference in reduction in blood flow could be observed between the two groups. The ABThera system afforded significantly better fluid evacuation from the wound, better drainage of the abdomen and better wound contraction than the VAC dressing. |
[
right
kwic]
(1)67  differences |
(15)5 correlations |
(29)3 influence |
(44)2 dose-dependent |
| (2)40 increase |
(16)5 effects |
(30)3 negative |
(45)2 elevation |
| (3)36 difference |
(17)5 for |
(31)3 number |
(46)2 evidence |
| (4)28 decrease |
(18)5 increases |
(32)3 roles |
(47)2 factors |
| (5)12 reduction |
(19)5 risk |
(33)2 (P |
(48)2 group |
| (6)11 predictors |
(20)4 effect |
(35)2 alterations |
(49)2 inhibition |
| (7)10 association |
(21)4 in |
(36)2 and |
(50)2 interaction |
| (8)9 improvement |
(22)4 reductions |
(37)2 at |
(51)2 morbidity |
| (9)8 *null* | (23)4 relationship |
(38)2 between-group |
(52)2 positive |
| (10)7 changes |
(24)3 (p |
(39)2 blood |
(53)2 prediction |
| (11)7 predictor |
(25)3 alteration |
(40)2 challenge |
(54)2 proportion |
| (12)7 role |
(26)3 as |
(41)2 contribution |
(55)2 source |
| (13)6 correlation |
(27)3 higher |
(42)2 cytotoxic |
(56)2 time |
| (14)5 associations |
(28)3 improvements |
(43)2 decreases |
add keyword
--- WordNet output for significant ---