ELIZA cgi-bash version rev. 1.90
- Medical English LInking keywords finder for the PubMed Zipped Archive (ELIZA) -

return kwic search for significant out of >500 occurrences
583352 occurrences (No.14 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [no cache] 500 found
33) There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to vertical and horizontal dimensions and graft area at day 90 (p > 0.05).
--- ABSTRACT ---
PMID:23728804 DOI:10.1007/s10103-013-1349-7
2015 Lasers in medical science
* Dimensional changes in free gingival grafts: scalpel versus Er:YAG laser--a preliminary study.
- The aim of this clinical study was to compare dimensional changes of the transplanted grafts when the recipient area was prepared with either erbium:yttrium, aluminum, and garnet (Er:YAG) laser or scalpel in free gingival grafts (FGGs). In the first and second groups of ten patients, the recipient area was prepared with an Er:YAG laser and a scalpel, respectively. All grafts were harvested from the palate at standard dimensions (horizontal, 14 mm; vertical, 8 mm). Probing depth, clinical attachment level, and keratinized tissue width were measured before surgery. FGG dimensions (width, length, and area) were measured using the University of North Carolina-15 manual probe (N15) (Nordent Manufacturing, Inc., IL, USA) during surgery and at 10, 21, and 90 days postoperatively. Differences between the two groups were statistically analyzed. In both groups, there was a statistically significant reduction in vertical and horizontal dimensions (p < 0.05) and graft area (p < 0.05) at all time points compared to the baseline measurements. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to vertical and horizontal dimensions and graft area at day 90 (p > 0.05). The Er:YAG laser may be used with similar effectiveness as the scalpel in the preparation of the recipient site for free gingival grafts.
--- ABSTRACT END ---
[
right
kwic]
[frequency of next (right) word to significant]
(1)67 differences (15)5 correlations (29)3 influence (44)2 dose-dependent
(2)40 increase (16)5 effects (30)3 negative (45)2 elevation
(3)36 difference (17)5 for (31)3 number (46)2 evidence
(4)28 decrease (18)5 increases (32)3 roles (47)2 factors
(5)12 reduction (19)5 risk (33)2 (P (48)2 group
(6)11 predictors (20)4 effect (35)2 alterations (49)2 inhibition
(7)10 association (21)4 in (36)2 and (50)2 interaction
(8)9 improvement (22)4 reductions (37)2 at (51)2 morbidity
(9)8 *null* (23)4 relationship (38)2 between-group (52)2 positive
(10)7 changes (24)3 (p (39)2 blood (53)2 prediction
(11)7 predictor (25)3 alteration (40)2 challenge (54)2 proportion
(12)7 role (26)3 as (41)2 contribution (55)2 source
(13)6 correlation (27)3 higher (42)2 cytotoxic (56)2 time
(14)5 associations (28)3 improvements (43)2 decreases

add keyword

--- WordNet output for significant --- =>意義深い, 重大な, 意味のある, 意味ありげな, 重要な Overview of adj significant The adj significant has 4 senses (first 4 from tagged texts) 1. (18) significant, important -- (important in effect or meaning; "a significant change in tax laws"; "a significant change in the Constitution"; "a significant contribution"; "significant details"; "statistically significant") 2. (9) significant, substantial -- (fairly large; "won by a substantial margin") 3. (3) significant -- (too closely correlated to be attributed to chance and therefore indicating a systematic relation; "the interaction effect is significant at the .01 level"; "no significant difference was found") 4. (2) meaning, pregnant, significant -- (rich in significance or implication; "a meaning look") --- WordNet end ---