ELIZA

return kwic search for through out of >500 occurrences
437431 occurrences (No.38 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [cache]

249) Concretely, we conduct evaluations through simulation experiments that examine linking accuracy based on a MFRM while changing numbers of common raters and tasks with various factors that possibly affect linking accuracy.

--- ABSTRACT ---

PMID:33169286 DOI:10.3758/s13428-020-01498-x

2021 Behavior research methods

* Accuracy of performance-test linking based on a many-facet Rasch model.

- Performance assessments, in which human raters assess examinee performance in practical tasks, have attracted much attention in various assessment contexts involving measurement of higher-order abilities. However, difficulty persists in that ability measurement accuracy strongly depends on rater and task characteristics such as rater severity and task difficulty. To resolve this problem, various item response theory (IRT) models incorporating rater and task parameters, including many-facet Rasch models (MFRMs), have been proposed. When applying such IRT models to datasets comprising results of multiple performance tests administered to different examinees, test linking is needed to unify the scale for model parameters estimated from individual test results. In test linking, test administrators generally need to design multiple tests such that raters and tasks partially overlap. The accuracy of linking under this design is highly reliant on the numbers of common raters and tasks. However, the numbers of common raters and tasks required to ensure high accuracy in test linking remain unclear, making it difficult to determine appropriate test designs. We therefore empirically evaluate the accuracy of IRT-based performance-test linking under common rater and task designs. Concretely, we conduct evaluations through simulation experiments that examine linking accuracy based on a MFRM while changing numbers of common raters and tasks with various factors that possibly affect linking accuracy.

--- ABSTRACT END ---

[
right
kwic]

[frequency of next (right) word to through]

(1)82 the	(13)3 discussion	(25)2 Google	(37)2 improving
(2)42 a	(14)3 food	(26)2 MEDLINE,	(38)2 induction
(3)8 an	(15)3 information	(27)2 Medline,	(39)2 lipid
(4)8 this	(16)3 inhibition	(28)2 PubMed	(40)2 multiple
(5)7 which	(17)3 its	(29)2 PubMed,	(41)2 nutrition
(6)6 resolution	(18)3 modulation	(30)2 abutment	(42)2 providing
(7)4 October	(19)3 searches	(31)2 analysis	(43)2 reference
(8)4 different	(20)3 several	(32)2 assessment	(44)2 semi-structured
(9)4 various	(21)3 their	(33)2 binding	(45)2 simulation
(10)3 January	(22)3 these	(34)2 dual	(46)2 specific
(11)3 July	(23)2 April	(35)2 gap	(47)2 thematic
(12)3 both	(24)2 August	(36)2 genetic

add keyword

--- WordNet output for through --- =>直通の, のために, の間じゅう, 終わって, を貫いて, の中を通って, のいたるところに, を通じて Overview of adj through The adj through has 2 senses (first 1 from tagged texts) 1. (4) done, through, through with -- (having finished or arrived at completion; "certain to make history before he's done"; "it's a done deed"; "after the treatment, the patient is through except for follow-up"; "almost through with his studies") 2. through -- ((of a route or journey etc.) continuing without requiring stops or changes; "a through street"; "a through bus"; "through traffic") Overview of adv through The adv through has 5 senses (first 3 from tagged texts) 1. (5) through -- (from beginning to end; "read this book through") 2. (2) through -- (over the whole distance; "this bus goes through to New York") 3. (1) through -- (to completion; "think this through very carefully!") 4. through -- (in diameter; "this cylinder measures 15 inches through") 5. through, through and through -- (throughout the entire extent; "got soaked through in the rain"; "I'm frozen through"; "a letter shot through with the writer's personality"; "knew him through and through"; "boards rotten through and through") --- WordNet end ---