ELIZA cgi-bash version rev. 1.90
- Medical English LInking keywords finder for the PubMed Zipped Archive (ELIZA) -

return kwic search for who out of >500 occurrences
271863 occurrences (No.95 in the rank) during 5 years in the PubMed. [cache]
163) Class I (recreational poker players) includes those who have the lowest probability of engaging intensively in different game modes.
--- ABSTRACT ---
PMID:24317705 DOI:10.1007/s10899-013-9429-y
2015 Journal of gambling studies
* Are poker players all the same? Latent class analysis.
- Poker is the gambling game that is currently gaining the most in popularity. However, there is little information on poker players' characteristics and risk factors. Furthermore, the first studies described poker players, often recruited in universities, as an homogeneous group who played in only one of the modes (land based or on the Internet). This study aims to identify, through latent class analyses, poker player subgroups. A convenience sample of 258 adult poker players was recruited across Quebec during special events or through advertising in various media. Participants filled out a series of questionnaires (Canadian Problem Gambling Index, Beck Depression, Beck Anxiety, erroneous belief and alcohol/drug consumption). The latent class analysis suggests that there are three classes of poker players. Class I (recreational poker players) includes those who have the lowest probability of engaging intensively in different game modes. Participants in class II (Internet poker players) all play poker on the Internet. This class includes the highest proportion of players who consider themselves experts or professionals. They make a living in part or in whole from poker. Class III (multiform players) includes participants with the broadest variety of poker patterns. This group is complex: these players are positioned halfway between professional and recreational players. Results indicate that poker players are not an homogeneous group identified simply on the basis of the form of poker played. The specific characteristics associated with each subgroup points to vulnerabilities that could potentially be targeted for preventive interventions.
--- ABSTRACT END ---
[
right
kwic]
[frequency of next (right) word to who]
(1)62 were (15)5 participated (29)2 Basic (43)2 read
(2)53 had (16)5 sexually (30)2 believed (44)2 require
(3)25 are (17)4 do (31)2 can (45)2 required
(4)25 have (18)4 is (32)2 commuted (46)2 scored
(5)25 underwent (19)4 responded (33)2 consumed (47)2 showed
(6)21 received (20)4 sought (34)2 deal (48)2 smoked
(7)14 presented (21)3 attended (35)2 died (49)2 struggle
(8)13 developed (22)3 has (36)2 experience (50)2 suffered
(9)11 reported (23)3 in (37)2 had, (51)2 sustained
(10)11 was (24)3 lived (38)2 live (52)2 took
(11)10 completed (25)3 may (39)2 lives (53)2 use
(12)10 experienced (26)3 met (40)2 measured (54)2 wanted
(13)8 did (27)3 work (41)2 participate
(14)5 inject (28)3 would (42)2 present

add keyword

--- WordNet output for who --- =>だれ, だれが, だれを, する(人), そしてその人は, 世界保健機構 Overview of noun who The noun who has 1 sense (no senses from tagged texts) 1. World Health Organization, WHO -- (a United Nations agency to coordinate international health activities and to help governments improve health services) --- WordNet end ---